Programmes · biological seed treatments
the category leads; product identity appears only in authorised detail| Programme | Sites | Chain state | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winter wheat programme · 2025–26 | 14 | 28 case files · 33 comparisons measured · 4 outcomes pending | active |
| Spring barley pilot programme · 2026 | 6 | protocol agreed · actual events logging · 2 of 6 outcomes measured | pilot P-07 |
| Use-context registry | 6 | each recorded use context opens its comparable evidence — including gaps | live |
Winter wheat programme · authorised detail
fictional product identity · demo disclosureProduct (authorised view only)
"Proof Demo Biological Input A" — a fictional identity for demonstration; public surfaces show only the category
Category · formulation
biological seed treatment · liquid, applied at dressing
Recorded use contexts
standard N (18) · reduced N (9) · min-till (6) · spring barley (7) · OSR (5) · organic (<5, suppressed)
Programme design
reference arm required · same-management confirmed · weighbridge or calibrated monitor basis
Honest outcome mix · this programme
Favourable
10 of 33
No clear difference
7 of 33
Mixed
5 of 33
Adverse
4 of 33
Incomplete · unresolved · pending
6 · 1 · 4
n=33 comparisons · 26 measured · 7 pending or unresolved · walking a buyer through the full mix is the credibility move — each segment opens to its records, affiliations visible.
Why two similar trials can't be pooled
the compatibility explainer, kept close to the programme| PRF-UK-A-000231 | PRF-UK-F-001873 | |
|---|---|---|
| Reference arm | untreated strip | farm standard + fungicide |
| Yield method | weighbridge | yield monitor · calibration on file |
| Poolable? | no — the reference arms answer different questions; pooling would manufacture a result | |
Programme rules: category-led everywhere public; fictional product identity confined to authorised detail with its
disclosure; no efficacy claim, ranking or recommendation; the full outcome mix travels with every pack.